Skip to content

Improper Path Validation Allows Recursive Deletion of the Nginx Configuration Directory

Moderate
0xJacky published GHSA-m8p8-53vf-8357 Mar 28, 2026

Package

gomod /0xJacky/nginx-ui (Go)

Affected versions

< = 2.3.3

Patched versions

v2.3.4

Description

Summary

The nginx-ui configuration improperly handles URL-encoded traversal sequences. When specially crafted paths are supplied, the backend resolves them to the base Nginx configuration directory and executes the operation on the base directory (/etc/nginx). In particular, this allows an authenticated user to remove the entire /etc/nginx directory, resulting in a partial Denial of Service.

Details

The file deletion logic fails to correctly validate and normalize paths containing URL-encoded traversal sequences such as ..%252F.

When such input is processed, the internal path resolution logic attempts to clamp the path into the allowed configuration directory. Instead of rejecting the traversal attempt, the clamping mechanism resolves the path to the base Nginx configuration directory itself.

Because the deletion handler invokes os.RemoveAll, which recursively removes directories, this results in the deletion of the entire /etc/nginx directory.

This behavior creates a dangerous interaction between path normalization and deletion logic:

  • Traversal sequences are not rejected.
  • Double-encoding (..%252F) is used to bypass initial shallow filters.
  • The clamping mechanism resolves malicious paths to the base configuration directory.
  • The deletion handler recursively deletes the resolved path.

As a result, an attacker can trigger deletion of the entire Nginx configuration directory instead of being blocked by path validation logic.

Root Cause

The vulnerability results from a combination of design flaws:

  • Improper Path Canonicalization: URL-encoded traversal sequences are not properly rejected.
  • Unsafe Fallback Logic: The GetConfPath clamping mechanism returns the base configuration directory when traversal is detected instead of rejecting the request.
  • Unsafe Deletion Primitive: The deletion handler invokes os.RemoveAll, which recursively deletes directories without additional safeguards. (delete.go)
	// Delete the file or directory
	err = os.RemoveAll(fullPath)
	if err != nil {
		cosy.ErrHandler(c, err)
		return
	}

This interaction causes the deletion operation to target the most sensitive directory when a traversal attempt occurs.

Environment

  • Server OS: Kali Linux 6.17.10-1kali1 (6.17.10+kali-amd64)
  • Nginx UI Version: nginx-ui v2.3.3
  • Deployment: Docker / Default installation

Proof of Concept

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Log into nginx-ui.

  2. Go to Manage Configs and create a Folder named ..%252F..%252F..%252F..%252Ftest

image
  1. Observe that the backend resolves the path to /etc/nginx..

  2. Now lets create a file called testing.

  3. Save it and rename it to ..%252F..%252F..%252F..%252Ftest (It is not possible to create it directly with the payload name so we have to rename it)

  4. Go back to manage configs and Click Delete to remove the file we just created.

  5. Check that there is an error:

image
  1. Reload the website and check that the /etc/nginx folder has been completely removed:
image

Impact

An authenticated user capable of invoking the configuration deletion endpoint can trigger the recursive deletion of the entire Nginx configuration directory (/etc/nginx).

This results in:

  • Immediate failure of the Nginx service due to missing configuration files.
  • Loss of all Nginx configuration managed by nginx-ui.
  • Denial of Service for all web services relying on the affected Nginx instance.

As the deletion operation uses a recursive filesystem call, the entire configuration directory is removed, leaving the system unable to restart Nginx until the configuration is manually restored.

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements None
Privileges Required High
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability High
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

CVE ID

CVE-2026-33027

Weaknesses

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. Learn more on MITRE.

External Control of File Name or Path

The product allows user input to control or influence paths or file names that are used in filesystem operations. Learn more on MITRE.

Credits